4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Antipredator responses and defensive behavior: ecological and ethological approaches for the neurosciences

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 25, Issue 7-8, Pages 577-586

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00042-2

Keywords

defense; predator-prey; risk assessment; threat; learning; parasites; mate responses; foraging; fear; stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In nature, animals are exposed to a wide range of threats and dangers with predators being amongst the more prominent and intensely studied of these. The responses of prey to predators and various predator avoidance and antipredator behaviors have been extensively evaluated from ecological and ethological perspectives and more recent ethopharmacological and neuroscience approaches. Unfortunately, there has been relatively little interchange between the ecological - ethological and neuroscience areas with the latter often using responses to predators just simply as another 'model' system. There is, however, now a growing realization that integrative approaches incorporating ecological, evolutionary and neurobiological explanations are required for the understanding of behavior and its functions. This necessitates an incorporation of ecological and ethological concepts and validity with neuroscience approaches to the analysis of antipredator responses and defensive behavior. A number of selected ecological approaches that are used for the investigation of predator avoidance mechanisms and antipredator defensive behavior patterns are briefly reviewed here. These include examinations of how predation risk and its variation affect decision making in animals and how learning affects these responses. The trade-offs that are involved, how the risk of predation affects decisions concerning foraging behavior, mating and reproduction, as well as how varying levels of risk affect decisions relative to the type of defensive mechanisms utilized are briefly outlined. The utility of these approaches and their relevance to the design and interpretation of various neuroscience studies is addressed here. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available