4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

A note on the efficiency of sandwich covariance matrix estimation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 96, Issue 456, Pages 1387-1396

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1198/016214501753382309

Keywords

coverage probability; generalized estimating equation; generalized linear model; heteroscedasticity; linear regression; marginal model; quasi-likelihood; robust covariance estimator; sandwich estimator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sandwich estimator, also known as robust covariance matrix estimator, heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimate, or empirical covariance matrix estimator, has achieved increasing use in the econometric literature as well as with the growing popularity of generalized estimating equations. Its virtue is that it provides consistent estimates of the covariance matrix for parameter estimates even when the fitted parametric model fails to hold or is not even specified. Surprisingly thou.-h, there has been little discussion of properties of the sandwich method other than consistency, We investigate the sandwich estimator in quasi-likelihood models asymptotically, and in the linear case analytically. We show that under certain circumstances when the quasi-likelihood model is correct, the sandwich estimate is often far more variable than the usual parametric variance estimate, The increased variance is a fixed feature of the method and the price that one pays to obtain consistency even when the parametric model fails or when there is heteroscedasticity. We show that the additional variability directly affects the coverage probability of confidence intervals constructed from sandwich variance estimates. In fact, the use of sandwich variance estimates combined with t-distribution quantiles gives confidence intervals with coverage probability falling below the nominal value. We propose an adjustment to compensate for this fact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available