4.7 Article

Prevalence of insomnia symptoms in patients with sleep-disordered breathing

Journal

CHEST
Volume 120, Issue 6, Pages 1923-1929

Publisher

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.120.6.1923

Keywords

insomnia; obstructive sleep apnea; sleep-disordered breathing; upper airway resistance syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the prevalence of insomnia symptoms in patients with objectively diagnosed sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). Design: Retrospective medical chart review of a representative sample of patients with SDB. Setting: University sleep-disorders clinic and laboratory. Patients: Two hundred thirty-one patients with SDB were selected from a pool of approximately 2,000 patients with sleep disorders. Measurements: Data were extracted from intake questionnaires and polysomnographic studies. Results: Of 231 patients with SDB diagnoses, 115 patients reported no insomnia complaints (SDB-only patients) and 116 patients reported clinically meaningful insomnia complaints (SDB-plus patients). Compared to SDB-only patients, SDB-plus patients reported significantly worse mean sleep characteristics consistent with insomnia, including sleep latency (17 min vs 65 min), total sleep time (7.2 h vs 5.6 h), and sleep efficiency (92% vs 75%). SDB-plus patients experienced significantly more psychiatric disorders, cognitive-emotional symptoms, and physical and mental symptoms that disrupted or prevented sleep. SDB-plus patients also reported greater use of sedative and psychotropic medications and had significantly more primary complaints of insomnia, restless legs or leg jerks, and poor sleep quality despite having relatively similar referral rates for sleep apnea or complaints of loud snoring. Conclusions: Problematic insomnia symptoms were reported by 50% of a representative sample of patients with objectively diagnosed SDB. Research is needed to determine the degree to which insomnia and related symptoms and behaviors interfere with SDB treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available