4.6 Article

Mitral valve prolapse and mitral regurgitation are common in patients with polycystic kidney disease type 1

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 1208-1216

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.29216

Keywords

adult polycystic kidney disease (PKD); cardiac valvular abnormalities; mitral valve prolapse; mitral regurgitation; aortic regurgitation; left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH); echocardiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) have an increased occurrence of cardiac valve abnormalities. However, the prevalence of cardiac abnormalities in patients with a uniform genotype of ADPKD has not been previously reported. We performed M-mode and color Doppler echocardiography on 109 patients from 16 families with polycystic kidney disease type 1 (PKD1). Findings were compared with those of 73 unaffected family members and 73 healthy controls. Mitral valve prolapse was found in 26% of patients with PKD1, 14% of unaffected relatives, and 10% of control subjects. The prevalence of hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation (grade 2 or 3) was 13%, 4%, and 3%, respectively. Prevalences of grade 2 or 3 aortic regurgitation (8%, 4%, and 3%, respectively) and tricuspid regurgitation (4%, 6%, and 7%, respectively) were not significantly different among the three groups. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was found in 19% of subjects with PKD1, 6% of unaffected relatives, and 4% of control subjects. Systolic blood pressure and severity of renal insufficiency were related to mitral regurgitation and LVH in subjects with PKD1. The prevalence of cardiac valve abnormalities did not differ between unaffected relatives and control subjects. Mitral valve prolapse is a characteristic finding in patients with PKD1. Conversely, mitral regurgitation and LVH are likely to be secondary to elevated blood pressure in these patients. (C) 2001 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available