4.5 Article

High prevalence of unrecognized sleep apnoea in drug-resistant hypertension

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 2271-2277

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200112000-00022

Keywords

hypertension; obstructive sleep apnoea; blood pressure; obesity; antihypertensive drug therapy; ambulatory blood pressure measurement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To determine the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in adult patients with drug-resistant hypertension, a common problem in a tertiary care facility. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting University hypertension clinic. Patients and methods Adults with drug-resistant hypertension, defined as a clinic blood pressure of greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg, while taking a sensible combination of three or more antihypertensive drugs, titrated to maximally recommended doses. Each of the 41 participants completed an overnight polysomnographic study and all but two had a 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurement Results Prevalence of OSA, defined as an apnoea-hypopnoea index of greater than or equal to 10 obstructive events per hour of sleep, was 83% in the 24 men and 17 women studied. Patients were generally late middle-aged (57.2 +/- 1.6 years, mean +/- SE), predominantly white (85%), obese (body mass index, 34.0 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2)) and taking a mean of 3.6 +/- 0.1 different antihypertensive medications daily. OSA was more prevalent in men than in women (96 versus 65%, P = 0.014) and more severe (mean apnoea-hypopnoea index of 32.2 +/- 4.5 versus 14.0 +/- 3.1 events/h, P = 0.004). There was no gender difference in body mass index or age. Women with OSA were significantly older and had a higher systolic blood pressure, lower diastolic blood pressure, wider pulse pressure and slower heart rate than women without OSA. Conclusions The extraordinarily high prevalence of OSA in these patients supports its potential role in the pathogenesis of drug-resistant hypertension, and justifies the undertaking of a randomized controlled trial to corroborate this hypothesis. J Hypertens 19:2271-2277 (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available