4.7 Article

Kernel methods in system identification, machine learning and function estimation: A survey

Journal

AUTOMATICA
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 657-682

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.01.001

Keywords

Linear system identification; Prediction error methods; Model complexity selection; Bias-variance trade-off; Kernel-based regularization; Inverse problems; Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces; Gaussian processes

Funding

  1. European Community [FP7-ICT-223866-FeedNetBack, 257462-HYCON2]
  2. MIUR FIRB [RBFR12M3AC]
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. ERC [287381]
  5. European Research Council
  6. European Community [FP7-ICT-223866-FeedNetBack, 257462-HYCON2]
  7. MIUR FIRB [RBFR12M3AC]
  8. Swedish Research Council
  9. ERC [287381]
  10. European Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most of the currently used techniques for linear system identification are based on classical estimation paradigms coming from mathematical statistics. In particular, maximum likelihood and prediction error methods represent the mainstream approaches to identification of linear dynamic systems, with a long history of theoretical and algorithmic contributions. Parallel to this, in the machine learning community alternative techniques have been developed. Until recently, there has been little contact between these two worlds. The first aim of this survey is to make accessible to the control community the key mathematical tools and concepts as well as the computational aspects underpinning these learning techniques. In particular, we focus on kernel-based regularization and its connections with reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and Bayesian estimation of Gaussian processes. The second aim is to demonstrate that learning techniques tailored to the specific features of dynamic systems may outperform conventional parametric approaches for identification of stable linear systems. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available