4.6 Article

Comparison of physiological responses to morning and evening submaximal running

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 969-976

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/026404101317108471

Keywords

physiological responses; submaximal running; time of day

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of time of day on physiological responses to running at the speed at the lactate threshold. After determination of the lactate threshold, using a standard incremental protocol, nine male runners (age 26.3 +/-5.7 years, height 1.77 +/-0.07 m, mass 73.1 +/-6.5 kg, lactate threshold speed 13.6 +/-1.6 km.h(-1); mean +/- s) completed a standardized 30 min run at lactate threshold speed, twice within 24 h (07:00-09:00 h and 18:00-21:00 h). Core body temperature, heart rate, minute ventilation, oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide expired, respiratory exchange ratio and capillary blood lactate were measured at rest, after a warm-up and at 10, 20 and 30 min during the run. In addition, the rating of perceived exertion was reported every 10 min during the run. Significant diurnal variation was observed only for body temperature (36.9 +/-0.9 degreesC vs 37.3 +/-0.3 degreesC) and respiratory exchange ratio at rest (0.86 +/-0.01 vs 0.89 +/-0.07) (P<0.05). Diurnal variation persisted for body temperature throughout the warm-up (37.10.2 degreesC vs 37.5 +/-0.3 degreesC) and during exercise (36.2 +/-0.6 degreesC vs 38.6 +/-0.4 degreesC), but only during the warm-up for the respiratory exchange ratio (0.85 +/-0.05 vs 0.87 +/-0.02) (P<0.05). The rating of perceived exertion was significantly elevated during the morning trial (12.70.9 vs 11.9 +/-1.2) (P<0.05). These findings suggest that, despite the diurnal variation in body temperature, other physiological responses to running at lactate threshold speed are largely unaffected. However, a longer warm-up may be required in morning trials because of a slower increase in body temperature, which could have an impact on ventilation responses and ratings of perceived exertion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available