4.4 Article

Effects of estrogen on activity and fear-related behaviors in mice

Journal

HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 472-482

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1716

Keywords

estrogen; fear; activity; mice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estrogen has been shown to affect nonreproductive behaviors in humans and rodents, including anxiety, fear, and activity levels. Rat studies have shown increases and decreases in these behaviors. Inconsistencies may be due to differences in testing conditions and the extent to which each test measures anxiety, fear, or activity. Few mouse studies have been performed. The present study was conducted to address these issues by examining the effect of estradiol benzoate (EB) in ovariectomized (OVX), C57BL/6 mice on a range of behavioral paradigms measuring anxiety [open field (OF), dark-light transition (DLT), elevated plus maze (EP)], activity [running wheel (RW)], and conditioned fear learning (FCon). In OF, vehicle (Veh) animals spent more time in the center than EB-treated animals and were more active overall. In DLT, Veh animals were more active than EB-treated animals in both the dark and light compartments and made more transitions between the two. In EP, Veh animals entered a greater number of arms. During FCon, EB animals froze more than Veh to the conditioned stimulus. In contrast, in the home cage RW, EB animals were more active than Veh. Factor analysis was used to characterize intertask correlations of females' behavior and to explore the possibility that estrogen may have an impact on a general arousal factor. In sum, estrogen treatment heightened fear responses in a range of fear and anxiety-provoking situations (OF, DLT, EP, and FCon), while increasing activity in the safer RW. We suggest that EB treatment may result in a generally more aroused animal. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available