4.7 Article

Effect of temperature on diatom volume, growth rate, and carbon and nitrogen content: Reconsidering some paradigms

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 46, Issue 8, Pages 2008-2018

Publisher

AMER SOC LIMNOLOGY OCEANOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.8.2008

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the response of diatoms to naturally experienced temperatures and tested these hypotheses: (1) diatoms follow the rule that organism size decreases with increasing temperature; (2) diatom growth rate follows a Q(10)-like response; (3) diatom carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) content per unit volume (V) decrease with increasing size, and changes in temperature affect this relationship and (4) diatom C:V s is the same as that of other phytoplankton. We also present, as predictive equations, relationships between (1) growth rate, temperature, and size; (2) C content and V: and (3) N content and V. Eight diatoms and two flagellates were acclimated for approximately five generations and grown for approximately five more generations at five temperatures (9-25 degreesC) on a 14:10 light: dark cycle at similar to 50 mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1). Growth rate, cell V, and C and N content per cell were measured relationships between these parameters and temperature were determined. For five diatoms and both flagellates, cell V decreased with increasing temperature; cells decrease by similar to4% of their mean V per degreesC. Growth rate appeared to increase linearly with temperature in all cases. The literature suggests that a linear response is the rule, not the exception. Temperature did not significantly affect C or N per V of diatom species. When all diatoms were considered. both C and N per V decreased with increasing cell sized our data support the argument that diatoms differ from other protists in this respect, but the difference is less pronounced than stated in previous reports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available