4.6 Article

Gender differences in lipid and glucose kinetics during short-term fasting

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.6.E1333

Keywords

fatty acids; lipolysis; glucose production; stable isotopes

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00036, RR-00954] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-01459-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-37948, DK-56341] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data obtained from studies conducted in animal models and humans suggest that gender affects the metabolic response to fasting. However, differences in body composition between males and females confound the interpretation of these studies, because increased adiposity itself alters the metabolic response to short-term fasting. We evaluated whole body lipid and glucose kinetics during basal (14-h fast) and short-term fasting (22-h fast) conditions in six women and six men who were matched for adiposity (24 +/- 2 and 23 +/- 2% body wt as fat, respectively). Substrate kinetics were measured by infusing stable isotope labeled tracers of glucose ([H-2(2)]glucose) and glycerol ([H-2(5)]glycerol). Basal glycerol rate of appearance (R-a) in plasma, an indicator of whole body lipolytic rate, was greater in women than in men (2.1 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.1 mu mol.kg body wt(-1).min(-1); P < 0.05). However, the relative increase in glycerol R-a with continued fasting was blunted in women compared with men (40 +/- 7 vs. 80 +/- 4% increase; P < 0.05), resulting in similar lipolytic rates in both genders at 22 h (2.8 +/- 0.2 and 2.6 +/- 0.1 mu mol.kg body wt(-1).min(-1) for women and men, respectively). In contrast, glucose R-a was similar in men and women at 14 h (11 +/- 0.6 vs. 12 +/- 0.7 mu mol.kg body wt(-1).min(-1)) and 22 h of fasting (9 +/- 0.6 vs. 10 +/- 0.6 mu mol.kg body wt(-1).min(-1)). These data demonstrate the presence of sexual dimorphism in lipid, but not glucose, metabolism during both basal and short-term fasting conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available