4.0 Review

Mechanisms of axonal dysfunction after spinal cord injury: with an emphasis on the role of voltage-gated potassium channels

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
Volume 38, Issue 1-2, Pages 165-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00134-5

Keywords

spinal cord injury; axonal dysfunction; potassium channel; Kv1.1; Kv1.2; safety factor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dysfunction of surviving axons which traverse the site of spinal cord injury (SCI) appears to contribute to posttraumatic neurological deficits, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Although demyelination of injured but surviving axons following trauma appear to be a major contributor of axonal conduction deficits, altered activity of ion channels may also play an important role. It has been theorized that exposure of K+ channels as a result of demyelination would result in a reduced safety factor of action potential propagation across the demyelinated region of the axon. This theory and electrophysiological studies using K+ channel blockers on animal nerve preparations prompted the investigation of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), a blocker of rapidly activating voltage-gated K+ channels, as a therapeutic agent in both multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injured patients. Several preliminary clinical trials have already demonstrated therapeutic benefit of 4-AP in both multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injured patients. In this review, we shall give a comprehensive summary of the mechanisms of axonal dysfunction following SCI and how axonal dysfunction may have resulted due to specific pathological changes following trauma including the ultrastructural and molecular changes that occur to myelinated axons. The pathology of spinal cord injury is very complex and many different mechanisms may contribute to axonal conduction deficits and the associated sensory and motor loss. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available