4.2 Article

Phenotypic plasticity of body size in Drosophila:: effects of a daily periodicity of growth temperature in two sibling species

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 351-361

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.0307-6962.2001.00255.x

Keywords

cold and heat stress; Drosophila melanogaster; D. simulans; norms of reaction; phenotypic variability; sex dimorphism; thorax and wing length

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Variation of wing and thorax length under thermoperiodic growth conditions was analysed in four strains of two sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, from two European localities. Results were compared to those obtained with constant temperatures ranging from 12 to 31 degreesC. Under constant temperatures the data basically confirmed previous results: concave reaction norms for wing and thorax length; a monotonically decreasing norm for wing : thorax ratio; and an increasing norm for sex dimorphism (female : male ratio). Phenotypic variability was maximum at extreme temperatures and minimum at middle ones. Slight differences were observed according to the geographical origin: the difference between strains from Bordeaux (France) and Cordoba (Spain) was maximum at low temperatures but disappeared at about 28 degreesC. According to the temperatures chosen, alternating thermal regimens had either no effect or produced a significant size reduction, probably reflecting a periodic stress. The magnitude of this effect was proportional to the amplitude of the thermoperiod but not to the quality (cold or heat) of the stress. In a similar way, the wing : thorax ratio was either not modified or reduced significantly, indicating that wing length was relatively more affected than thorax length by alternating thermal regimens. Sex dimorphism also showed either no change or a significant increase, indicating that males were relatively more reactive than females to alternating conditions. Finally, regimens of broad amplitudes increased the phenotypic variability, again an indication of stressful effects. All these observations should be taken into account when analysing phenotypic variability in nature and trying to understand natural selection in wild-living populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available