4.4 Article

Role for inducible nitric oxide synthase in protection from chronic Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital disease in mice and its regulation by oxygen free radicals

Journal

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 7374-7379

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7374-7379.2001

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

has been previously reported that although inducible nitric oxide synthase (MOS) gene knockout (NOS2(-/-)) mice resolve Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection, the production of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) via iNOS protects a significant proportion of mice from hydrosalpinx formation and infertility. We now report that higher in vivo RNS production correlates with mouse strain-related innate resistance to hydrosalpinx formation. We also show that mice with a deletion of a key component of phagocyte NADPH oxidase (p47(phox-/-)) resolve infection, produce greater amounts of RNS in vivo, and sustain lower rates of hydrosalpinx formation than both wild-type (WT) NOS2(+/+) and NOS2(-/-) controls. When we induced an in vivo chemical block in iNOS activity in p47(phox-/-) mice using NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), a large proportion of these mice eventually succumbed to opportunistic infections, but not before they resolved their chlamydial infections. Interestingly, when compared to WT and untreated p47(phox-/-) controls, L-NMMA-treated p47(phox-/-) mice resolved their infections more rapidly. However, L-NMMA-treated p47(phox-/-) mice lost resistance to chronic chlamydial disease, as evidenced by an increased rate of hydrosalpinx formation that was comparable to that for NOS2(-/-) mice. We conclude that phagocyte oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) regulate RNS during chlamydial urogenital infection in the mouse. We further conclude that while neither phagocyte oxidase-derived ROS nor iNOS-derived RNS are essential for resolution of infection, RNS protect from chronic chlamydial disease in this model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available