4.6 Review

Tregitope update: Mechanism of action parallels IVIg

Journal

AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 436-443

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.08.017

Keywords

Treg; Tregitope; IVIg; Autoimmunity; MHC; Tolerance

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH for the Emory Tetramer Facility, Emory University [N01-AI25456]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the course of screening immunoglobulin G (IgG) sequences for T cell epitopes, we identified novel Treg epitope peptides, now called Tregitopes, contained in the highly conserved framework regions of Fab and Fc. Tregitopes may provide one explanation for the expansion and stimulation of Treg cells following intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. Their distinguishing characteristics include in silico signatures that suggest high-affinity binding to multiple human HLA class II DR and conservation across IgG isotypes and mammalian species with only minor amino acid modifications. Tregitopes induce expansion of CD4(+)/CD25(hi)/FoxP3(+) T cells and suppress immune responses to co-incubated antigens in vitro. By comparing the human IgG Tregitopes (hTregitopes 167 and 289, located in the IgG CH1 and CH2 domains) and Fab to murine sequences, we identified class II-restricted murine Tregitope homologs (mTregitopes). In vivo, mTregitopes suppress inflammation and reproducibly induce Tregs to expand. In vitro studies suggest that the Tregitope mechanism of action is to induce Tregs to respond, leading to production of regulatory signals, followed by modulation of dendritic cell phenotype. The identification of Treg epitopes in IgG suggests that additional Tregitopes may also be present in other autologous proteins; methods for identifying and validating such peptides are described here. The discovery of Tregitopes in IgG and other autologous proteins may lead to the development of new insights as to the role of Tregs in autoimmune diseases. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available