4.5 Article

Antinociceptive profiles of aspirin and acetaminophen in formalin, substance P and glutamate pain models

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 921, Issue 1-2, Pages 233-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)03126-2

Keywords

aspirin; acetaminophen; formalin test; substance P; glutamate; spinal cord

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aspirin (ASA) is widely used oral analgesics and acts as an inhibitor of cyclo-oxygenase. Also. acetaminophen (APAP) is effective analgesics and may selectively inhibit brain prostaglandin synthetase. However, their mechanisms of action in CNS are poorly defined, although several authors have shown that the antinociceptive effects of ASA and APAP have different underlying mechanisms and play some possible roles on spinal nociceptive processing. such as inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. To define and characterize antinociceptive profiles of ASA and APAP on various pain models, we performed intraplantar formalin injection test, intrathecal (i.t.) substance P (0.7 mug)-induced nociceptive response test, and i.t. glutamate (20 mug)-induced nociceptive response test after ASA or APAP (from 10 to 300 mg/kg) administered orally to the mouse. In the formalin test, ASA produced an antinociceptive effect during only the 2nd phase (20-40 min), but not the 1st phase (0-5 min), in a dose-dependent manner. However, APAP showed a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect during both phases of the formalin test. In addition, both ASA and APAP reduced nociceptive behavior induced by glutamate administered i.t. in a dose-dependent manner. In substance P-induced nociceptive response, APAP, but not ASA, showed antinociceptive effect in a dose-dependent manner. Our results suggest that ASA and APAP administered orally may be mediated by different nociceptive processing at the spinal cord level. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available