4.6 Article

Structure and properties of regenerated cellulose films prepared from cotton linters in NaOH/Urea aqueous solution

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 25, Pages 5923-5928

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie0010417

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regenerated cellulose (RC) films having various viscosity-average molecular weights (M-eta) ranging from 2.2 x 10(4) to 8.2 x 10(4) g/mol were prepared from cotton linters in 6 wt % NaOH/4 wt % urea aqueous solution by coagulation with 2 M acetic acid and 2% H2SO4 aqueous solution. The dissolution of cellulose and the structure, transparency, and mechanical properties of the RC films were investigated by C-13 NMR, ultraviolet, and infrared spectroscopies; scanning electron microscopy; X-ray diffraction; and a strength test. The RC films exhibited the cellulose II crystalline form and a homogeneous structure with 85% light transmittance at 800 nm. C-13 NMR spectroscopy indicated that the presence of urea in NaOH aqueous solution significantly enhanced the intermolecular hydrogen bonding between cellulose and the solvent, resulting in a higher solubility of cellulose and the complete transition of its crystalline form from I to II. The tensile strength (ab) of the RC films in the dry state increased with increasing M-eta up to 6.0 x 104 g/mol and then hardly changed. The values of ob and the breaking elongation (epsilon (b)) of the RC film having M-eta = 6.0 x 10(4) g/mol by coagulation with 2% H2SO4 were found to be 106 MPa and 8.0%, respectively, in the dry state and 17.0 MPa and 10.7%, respectively, in the wet state, and the strength was much higher than that of commercially available cellophane. Therefore, a novel and nonpolluting process for the manufacture of cellulose film and fiber from cotton linters in 6 wt % NaOH/4 wt % urea aqueous solution is provided in this work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available