4.6 Article

Prospective study of major dietary patterns and colorectal cancer risk in women

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 154, Issue 12, Pages 1143-1149

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/154.12.1143

Keywords

cohort studies; colorectal neoplasms; diet; factor analysis, statistical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of prospective cohort studies have examined the relations of individual dietary variables to risk of colorectal cancer. Few studies have addressed the broader eating patterns that reflect many dietary exposures working together. Using data from a prospective study of 61,463 women, with an average follow-up period of 9.6 years (between 1987 and 1998) and 460 incident cases of colorectal cancer, the authors conducted a factor analysis to identify and examine major dietary patterns in relation to colorectal cancer risk. Using proportional hazards regression to estimate relative risks, the authors found no clear association between a Western, healthy, or drinker dietary pattern and colorectal cancer risk. However, the data suggested that consuming low amounts of foods that constitute a healthy dietary pattern may be associated with increased risks of colon and rectal cancers. An inverse association with the healthy dietary pattern was found among women under age 50 years, although the number of cancers in this age group was limited and interpretation of this finding should be cautious. In this age group, relative risks for women in increasing quintiles of the healthy dietary pattern, compared with the lowest quintile, were 0.74 (95% confidence interval (Cl): 0.41, 1.31), 0.69 (95% Ci: 0.39, 1.24), 0.59 (95% Cl: 0.32, 1.07), and 0.45 (95% Cl: 0.23, 0.88) (p for trend = 0.03). The role of overall eating patterns in predicting colorectal cancer risk requires further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available