4.8 Article

Genetic variation in coagulation and fibrinolytic proteins and their relation with acute myocardial infarction

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 104, Issue 25, Pages 3063-3068

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc5001.100793

Keywords

myocardial infarction; genetics; coagulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background - It is pathophysiologically conceivable that genetic variations in coagulation and fibrinolytic proteins are associated with the risk of myocardial infarction. Methods and Results - We performed a literature search to identify published case-control studies correlating the factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations or fibrinogen G-455A or plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G polymorphisms with the risk of myocardial infarction. Studies were included only if they used solid diagnostic criteria and complied with published methodological criteria. A common OR with corresponding 95% CI was calculated for the risk of myocardial infarction in a fixed-effect model according to Mantel-Haenszel. The factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20201A mutations did not significantly correlate with myocardial infarction (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.67, P = 0.12 and OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.35, P = 0.6, respectively). Inclusion of the studies that investigated young patients (< 55 years) made the association significant for factor V Leiden (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.61, P = 0.02). Homozygosity for the fibrinogen -455A allele was significantly associated with a decreased risk of myocardial infarction (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.99, P = 0.04), whereas the PAI-14G4G genotype was significantly associated with increased risk (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.39, P = 0.04). Conclusions-Associations between these genetic variations and myocardial infarction were weak or absent. In the absence of clinical implications, our results indicate that screening of patients with myocardial infarction for these genetic variations is not warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available