4.5 Article

NMR investigations of protein-carbohydrate interactions:: insights into the topology of the bound conformation of a lactose isomer and β-galactosyl xyloses to mistletoe lectin and galectin-1

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
Volume 1568, Issue 3, Pages 225-236

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4165(01)00224-0

Keywords

lectins; molecular recognition; transferred-NOESY; modeling; carbohydrates

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A hallmark of oligosaccharides is their often limited spatial flexibility, allowing them to access a distinct set of conformers in solution. Viewing each individual or even the complete ensemble of conformations as potential binding partner(s) for lectins in protein-carbohydrate interactions, it is pertinent to address the question on the characteristics of bound state conformation(s) in solution. Also, it is possible that entering the lectin's binding site distorts the low-energy topology of a glycosidic linkage. As a step to delineate the strategy of ligand selection for galactosides, a common physiological docking point, we have performed a NMR study on two non-homologous lectins showing identical monosaccharide specificity. Thus, the conformation of lactose analogues bound to bovine heart galectin-1 and to mistletoe lectin in solution has been determined by transferred nuclear Overhauser effect measurements. It is demonstrated that the lectins select the syn conformation of lactose and various structural analogues (Galbeta(1 --> 4)Xyl, Galbeta(1 --> 3)Xyl, Galbeta(1 --> 2)Xyl, and Galbeta(1 --> 3)Glc) from the ensemble of presented conformations. No evidence for conformational distortion was obtained. Docking of the analogues to the modeled binding sites furnishes explanations, in structural terms, for exclusive recognition of the syn conformer despite the non-homologous design of the binding sites. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available