4.7 Article

Influence of intramolecular hydrogen bond of templates on molecular recognition of molecularly imprinted polymers

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 450, Issue 1-2, Pages 53-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01390-3

Keywords

hydroxybenzoic acid; molecular imprinting; molecular recognition; intramolecular hydrogen bond

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) were prepared corresponding to three structurally related template compounds 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA), gentisic acid (GA) and salicylic acid (SA) that differ in intramolecular hydrogen bonding ability using acrylamide (AA) as a functional monomer. HPLC method was used to evaluate the binding performances of the MIPs to the templates and several analogues. The results showed that the difference in their molecular recognition ability was pronounced. The highest molecular recognition ability was observed for 4-HBA-imprinted polymer. It was proved that the hydrogen bond interaction between the functional monomer and the template (4-HBA) played a major role in the recognition process and Scatchard analysis showed that two classes of binding sites were formed in 4-HBA-imprinted polymer. Their dissociation constants were estimated to be 1.76 x 10(-4) and 1.40 x 10(-3) mol l(-1), respectively. But for GA- or SA-imprinted polymer the molecular recognition ability was not improved compared to the blank polymer (BP). By comparison of the structures of the three templates, it was concluded that the molecular recognition ability will decrease when the template itself is able to form intramolecular hydrogen bond in the molecular imprinting process. This study will be helpful for us to understand the molecular recognition mechanism of MIPs and of instructive significance for the prediction of the selectivity of MIPs. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available