4.7 Article

The production and decay kinetics of ClOO in water and freon-11: A time-resolved resonance raman study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 115, Issue 24, Pages 11228-11238

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1418733

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production of ClOO following OClO photolysis in water and fluorotrichloromethane (freon-11) is investigated using time-resolved resonance Raman (TRRR) spectroscopy. Stokes spectra are obtained as a function of time following OClO photoexcitation using pump and probe wavelengths of 390 and 260 nm, respectively. Scattering assignable to ClOO is observed, and appears with a time constant of 27.9 +/-4.5 ps in water and 172 +/- 30 ps in freon-11. The ClOO intensity decays with a time constant of similar to 398 +/- 50 ps in water and 864 +/- 200 ps in freon-11. Although the production and decay kinetics are solvent dependent, the quantum yield for ClOO production is similar between water and freon-11. Femtosecond pump-probe studies designed to monitor the evolution in optical density at 390 and 260 nm following OClO photoexcitation are also presented. These studies demonstrate that geminate recombination of the primary photoproducts is less efficient in freon-11 relative to water. This result taken in combination with the solvent invariance of the ClOO-production quantum yield indicates that ClOO is not formed via geminate recombination. Instead, the results presented here suggest that OClO photoisomerization results in the production of ClOO. Finally, the vibrational energy content of ClOO upon internal conversion to the ground state is studied through comparison of the ClOO Raman and absorption cross sections to those predicted using computational methods. These studies suggest that ground-state ClOO is produced with minimal excess vibrational energy. The results presented here provide new insight into the mechanism of ClOO formation following OClO photoexcitation. (C) 2001 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available