4.7 Article

Influence of leisure activity on the incidence of Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 12, Pages 2236-2242

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.57.12.2236

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR00645, M01 RR000645] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG007232, AG07232, P01 AG007232-11A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether leisure activities modify the risk for incident dementia. Background: Although high educational and occupational attainments have been associated with reduced risk of incident dementia, the relation between leisure activities and dementia risk has not been adequately investigated. Methods: A total of 1,772 nondemented individuals aged 65 years or older, living in northern Manhattan, New York, were identified and followed longitudinally in a community-based cohort incidence study. Subjects' leisure activities at baseline were assessed, annual examinations with the same standardized neurologic and neuropsychological measures were performed for up to 7 years (mean 2.9 years), and incident dementia was assessed as the main outcome measure. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, ethnic group, education, and occupation, were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of incident dementia associated with high leisure activities. Results: Of the 1,772 subjects, 207 became demented. The risk of dementia was decreased in subjects with high leisure activities (RR, 0.62; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.83). The association of high leisure with decreased RR of incident dementia was present even when baseline cognitive performance, health limitations interfering with desired leisure activities, cerebrovascular disease, and depression were considered. Conclusions: The data suggest that engagement in leisure activities may reduce the risk of incident dementia, possibly by providing a reserve that delays the onset of clinical manifestations of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available