4.7 Article

Iron isotopes in hot springs along the Juan de Fuca Ridge

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 194, Issue 1-2, Pages 39-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00538-6

Keywords

iron; stable isotopes; inductively coupled plasma methods; mass spectroscopy; Juan de Fuca Ridge; isotope fractionation; hydrothermal vents; fluid phase; sulfides; Canyon Diablo; Meteorite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present Fe isotope data for high temperature hydrothermal fluids, sulfides, and basalts from the Juan de Fuca Ridge, USGS basalt standard BCR-2 and the Canyon Diablo iron meteorite. The Fe isotopic compositions of all samples fall within a range of similar to 1 parts per thousand. However, there is a small but statistically significant isotopic variation between Fe dissolved in hydrothermal fluids and Fe in Canyon Diablo. Specifically, the hydrothermal fluids are lighter compared to Canyon Diablo, yielding delta(56)Fe (=[(Fe-56/Fe-54)(sample)/(Fe-56/Fe-54)(Canyon Diablo)-1] x 1000) values from -0.30parts per thousand to -0.77parts per thousand. In contrast, the BCR-2 basalt and Canyon Diablo are isotopically indistinguishable. Measurements of delta(56)Fe in Juan de Fuca Ridge basalts and sulfides suggest that Fe isotopes are fractionated in hydrothermal systems. However, the data do not exclude the possibility of small delta(56)Fe differences between the rocks from which fluid Fe is derived and other igneous Fe, in which case fractionation in igneous systems is indicated. Regardless, these results are evidence of non-biological mass fractionation of Fe isotopes in nature. Further, venting of hydrothermal fluids into the overlying water column could provide a source of isotopically light Fe to the deep oceans, contributing to Fe isotopic variations observed in deep-sea sediments. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available