4.4 Article

Hypermodification and immune escape of an internally deleted middle-envelope (M) protein of frequent and predominant hepatitis B virus variants

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 292, Issue 1, Pages 44-58

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/viro.2001.1239

Keywords

HBV; hepatitis B virus; envelope protein; preS2; hypermodification; immune escape; O-glycosylation; genotype; variants

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 70336, CA84217] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [T32 AI07536] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Naturally occurring deletions within the human hepatitis 8 virus (HBV) preS2 region have frequently been identified in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while chronic carriers without cirrhosis and HCC contain no detectable preS2 deletion variants. We have characterized two different preS2 internal deletion variants from two patients. In addition to several weak phenotypes, our study revealed three unexpected strong phenotypes: (1) a paradoxical hypermodification phenomenon was observed with significantly increased size heterogeneity and molecular weights of the secreted middle (M) envelope proteins containing a preS2 internal deletion. This phenomenon was observed in transient transfection with a human hepatoma Huh7 cell line as well as in stable transfection with a rodent hepatoma cell line 7777. (2) A significantly increased intracellular accumulation of all three envelope proteins (large, middle, and small) was detected by both Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence microscopy. (3) The middle envelope proteins with a preS2 internal deletion were not recognized in vitro by a putative neutralizing antiserum, suggesting that these variants can evade immune recognition in vivo. To our knowledge, this is the first identification and characterization of the M deletion variant protein in HBV natural infection. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available