4.7 Article

T helper 1 and T helper 2 cells are pathogenic in an antigen-specific model of colitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 195, Issue 1, Pages 71-84

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.2001889

Keywords

inflammatory bowel disease; E. coli; CD4; cytokines; TCR transgenic

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI35783, R21 AI035783, R01 AI035783] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK044240, DK 44240] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dysregulated T cell responses to enteric bacteria have been implicated as a common mechanism underlying pathogenesis in rodent models of colitis. However, the bacterial species and T cell specificities that induce disease have been poorly defined. We have developed a model system in which target antigen, bacterial host, and corresponding T cell specificity are defined. OVA-specific T cells from DO11.RAG-2(-/-) TCR transgenic mice were transferred into RAG-2(-/-) recipients whose intestinal tracts were colonized with OVA-expressing or control Escherichia coli. Transfer of antigen-naive DO11.RAG-2(-/-) T cells into recipients colonized with OVA-E. coli resulted in enhanced intestinal recruitment and cell cycling of OVA-specific T cells, however, there was no development of disease. In contrast, transfer of polarized T helper (Th) 1 and Th2 populations resulted in severe wasting and colitis in recipients colonized with OVA-expressing but not control E. coli. The histopathologic features of disease induced by Th1 and Th2 transfers were distinct, but disease severity was comparable. Induction of disease by both Th1 and Th2 transfers was dependent on bacterially associated OVA. These results establish that a single bacterially associated antigen can drive the progression of colitis mediated by both Th1 and Th2 cells and provide a new model for understanding the immunoregulatory interactions between T cells responsive to gut floral antigens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available