4.6 Article

Enhanced laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy using the combination of fourth-harmonic and fundamental Nd:YAG laser pulses

Journal

SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 121-135

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0584-8547(01)00358-5

Keywords

laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) laser plasma; double-pulse approach; mixed-wavelength laser pulse; aluminum alloy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have studied the combination of fourth-harmonic (266 nm) and fundamental (1064 nm) Nd:YAG laser pulses of the same irradiance. On a metallic target (Al), a sequence of ultraviolet (UV) and near-infrared (NIR) pulses produces deeper craters and can lead under certain conditions to analyte signal enhancements larger than those obtained with a NIR-NIR sequence. Compared to a single NIR pulse, signal enhancements by factors of approximately 30 for the Si I 288.16-nm line and 100 for the Al II 281.62-nm line were observed with double pulses of the same total energy. This effect correlates with a substantial increase in plasma temperature, with ionic lines and lines having a higher excitation energy experiencing a larger enhancement. Moreover, the optimal pulse separation is found to be larger for ionic than for neutral lines (similar to3 compared to similar to0.1 mus). Another finding of this study concerns the combination of two different wavelengths (266 and 1064 nm) in a single 'mixed-wavelength' pulse, a scheme that also leads to an enhanced laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) sensitivity. It is proposed that the double-pulse and mixed-wavelength approaches are both capable of temperature and signal enhancement for the same reason: a larger portion of laser energy is absorbed in the plasma region containing the analyte atoms, instead of being absorbed at the sample surface or in the atmosphere. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available