4.8 Article

An evaluation of tyramide signal amplification and archived fixed and frozen tissue in microarray gene expression analysis

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/30.2.e4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P50 AG016570] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH060233, R37 MH060233, R56 MH060233, MH-60233] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-41408, K08 NS041408] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded an ethanol-fixed tissues represent a potentially invaluable resource for gene expression analysis, as they are the most widely available material for studies of human disease. Little data are available evaluating whether RNA obtained from fixed (archival) tissues could produce reliable and reproducible microarray expression data. Here we compare the use of RNA Isolated from human archival. tissues fixed in ethanol and formalin to frozen tissue in cDNA microarray experiments. Since an additional factor that can limit the utility of archival tissue is the often small quantities available, we also evaluate the use of the tyramide signal amplification method (TSA), which allows the use of small amounts of RNA. Detailed analysis Indicates that TSA provides a consistent and reproducible signal amplification method for cDNA microarray analysis, across both arrays and the genes tested. Analysis of this method also highlights the importance of performing non-linear channel normalization and dye switching. Furthermore, archived, fixed specimens can perform well, but not surprisingly, produce more variable results than frozen tissues. Consistent results are more easily obtainable using ethanol-fixed tissues, whereas formalin-fixed tissue does not typically provide a useful substrate for cDNA synthesis and labeling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available