4.7 Article

Sand bars in tidal channels Part 2. Tidal meanders

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 451, Issue -, Pages 203-238

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112001006565

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Careful analysis of new field observations on the geometry of meandering tidal channels reveals that the values of meander wavelengths as well as curvatures, conveniently scaled by local channel width, fall within a fairly restricted range, suggesting the existence of some mechanistic process controlling meander formation. A three-dimensional model is then proposed to predict flow and bed topography in weakly meandering tidal channels. The analysis is developed for meander wavelengths much smaller than the tidal wavelength and assuming that sediment is transported both as bedload and as suspended load. Both conditions are typically met in nature. Due to the symmetry of the meander pattern investigated, the theory indicates that oscillations associated with the basic flow give rise to symmetric oscillations of the point bar-pool pattern around the locations of maximum curvature. However, no net migration in a tidal cycle is present, at least for periodic tides with zero mean. Suspended load leads both to an enhanced bottom deformation and to a downstream shifting of the position of the point bar. The model then provides the basis of a planimetric instability theory of the type developed for river meanders (Blondeaux & Seminara 1985). Though the available data do not yet allow a detailed quantitative comparison, it is shown that the wavelengths selected by the 'bend mechanism' are somewhat larger than those typically encountered in nature. The geomorphology of the process of meander formation in tidal environments is then discussed and, upon comparison with observational evidence, points out the need for various developments of the present model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available