4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Trends in bole biomass accumulation, net primary production and tree mortality in Pseudotsuga menziesii forests of contrasting age

Journal

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 2-3, Pages 213-217

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/22.2-3.213

Keywords

old-growth forest; permanent plots; tree growth; Tsuga heterophylla; western Cascade Range

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although it is generally accepted that the rate of accumulation of biomass declines as forests age, little is known about the relative contributions to this decline of changes in net primary production (NPP) and tree mortality. We used 10-15 years of observations of permanent plots in three small watersheds in and near the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, to examine these issues. The three watersheds are of similar elevation and potential productivity and support young (29 years at last measurement), mature (similar to100 years) and old (similar to400 years) forest dominated by Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco and Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg. Accumulation of tree bole biomass was greatest in the young stand, reaching similar to7 Mg ha(-1) year(-1) in the last measurement interval, Bole biomass accumulation was relatively constant (similar to4-5 Mg ha(-1) year(-1)) in the mature stand, and there was no net accumulation of bole biomass in the old-forest stand. The NPP of boles increased with time in the young stand, from similar to3 to similar to7 Mg ha(-1) year(-1), but was nearly constant in the mature and old-forest stands, at similar to6 and 3-4 Mg ha(-1) year(-1), respectively. Mortality increased slowly in the young stand (from < 0.1 to 0.3 Mg ha(-1) year(-1)), but fluctuated between 1-2 and 2-6 Mg ha(-1) year(-1) in the mature and old-forest stands, respectively. Thus, declining biomass accumulation with stand age reflects, in approximately equal amounts, both decreasing NPP and increasing mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available