4.6 Article

Does the Ingrowth Surface Make a Difference? A Retrieval Study of 423 Cementless Acetabular Components

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 706-712

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.028

Keywords

acetabular shells; bone ingrowth; implant retrieval

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of factors such as design, alloy and coating type on bony or fibrous tissue ingrowth was evaluated in a study of 423 retrieved cementless acetabular shells representing 16 shell designs. Small-beaded (250 pm) porous coatings, either with or without hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings, proved to be the superior porous surface for bone ingrowth. Small-beaded shells that were Duofix coated had predominantly fibrous tissue ingrowth. In addition to bead size, alloy type and surface type have significant effect on bone ingrowth. In contrast, there is no significant association between bone ingrowth and time in situ, with most bone ingrowth occurring early. Although roughened, press-fit shells have acceptable clinical and Registry data, they showed some of the lowest ingrowth/ongrowth scores of all the shells tested. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available