4.8 Article

Evaluation of wastewater toxicity:: comparative study between Microtox® and activated sludge oxygen uptake inhibition

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 919-924

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00299-8

Keywords

activated sludge; electrolytic respirometry; IC50; inhibition of respiration; toxicity; wastewater treatment plant (WWTP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microtox(R) is a frequent toxicity tool for the screening of wastewaters discharged into wastewater treatment plants. There is currently an increasing controversy between this test and others using activated sludge. A Microtox(R) and electrolytic respirometry comparative study for toxicity determination has been performed. Seven organic and five inorganic toxic compounds have been assessed for comparing both methods. Microtox(R) proved to have a higher sensitivity to toxicants but was less representative of effects on activated sludge compared to respirometry. For instance, assays accomplished with LAS, a biodegradable reference surfactant. showed a toxic effect by Microtox(R) but good biodegradability and no toxicity in respirometry. This could be explained by the different nature of the biological material used, as Microtox(R) utilises the seawater Vibrio fischeri, whereas respirometry uses the bacterial consortium in activated sludge. For the evaluation of the potential toxicity of a compound on a WWTP, the preferred biological material be used should be activated sludge itself. Results obtained with any other biological material would be just an approach to reality. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available