4.5 Article

Sungrazing comets:: Properties of nuclei and in situ detectability of cometary ions at 1 AU

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 155, Issue 2, Pages 350-364

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2001.6722

Keywords

comets, composition; comets, origin; solar wind

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A one-dimensional sublimation model for cometary nuclei is used to derive size limits for the nuclei of sungrazing comets and to estimate oxygen ion fluxes at 1 AU from their evaporation. Given that none of the approximate to300 sungrazers detected by the SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) was observed after disappearing behind the sun, and that small nuclei with a radius of approximate to3.5 m could be observed, it is assumed that all SOHO sungrazers were completely destroyed. For the case that sublimation alone is sufficient for destruction, the model yields an upper size limit as a function of nuclear density rho, albedo A, and perihelion distance q. If the density of the nuclei is that typical of porous ice (600 kg m(-3)). the maximum size is 63 m. These results confirm similar model calculations by, Weissman (1983). An analytical expression is derived that approximates the model results well. We discuss possible modifications of our results by different disruption mechanisms. While disruption by thermal stress does not change the upper size limits significantly, they, may be somewhat increased by tidal disruption (up to 100 m for a density of 600 kg m(-3)). dependent on the isotropy of the sublimation process and the tensile strength of the comet. Implications for the Kreutz family of sungrazers are discussed. Oxygen ions from the sublimation of sungrazing comets form a tail. Fluxes from this tail are sufficiently high to be measured at I AU by particle detectors on spacecraft, but the duration of a tail crossing is only about half an hour. Therefore, the probability of a spacecraft actually encountering a tail of an evaporating sungrazer is only of the order of 2% per year. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available