4.6 Article

Invasive fungal infections after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation:: incidence and risk factors in 395 patients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 2, Pages 475-482

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03259.x

Keywords

peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; allogeneic; fungal infections

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have analysed the incidence and risk factors for the occurrence of invasive fungal infections (IFI) among 395 recipients of an allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from a human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling. IFI (n = 50) occurred in 46 patients, giving an overall probability of 14%. There were 12 cases of invasive candidiasis (3%), with only one death. Non-Candida IFI occurred in 37 patients (12% probability), mostly invasive aspergillosis (n = 32). In multivariate, analysis the only two significant variables associated with a higher risk of developing a non-Candida IFI were the development of moderate-to-severe graft-versus-host disease (GvHD, P < 0.0001; OR 4.6) and having received steroid prophylaxis for GvHD (P = 0.04; OR 2.1). In multivariate analysis the variables associated with a lower overall survival after PBSCT were development of a non-Candida IFI (P < 0.0001; OR 5.6), non-early disease phase (P = 0.0001; OR 1.9), steroid prophylaxis (P = 0.02; OR 1.4), moderate-to-severe GvHD (P = 0.01; OR 1.6) and cytomegalovirus infection post transplant (P = 0.001; OR 1.8). Our results show that non-Candida IFI (in particular aspergillosis) was an important cause of infectious morbidity and mortality after an HLA-identical sibling PBSCT, while invasive candidiasis was rare. Use of steroid prophylaxis and, in particular, the development of moderate-to-severe GvHD post transplant were risk factors for non-Candida IFI. Prophylactic strategies for these infections should thus take into account these risk factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available