4.5 Article

Trabecular bone adaptation with an orthotropic material model

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 247-256

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00192-0

Keywords

trabecular bone; proximal femur; adaptation; mechanical properties; orthotropy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most bone adaptation algorithms, that attempt to explain the connection between bone morphology and loads, assume that bone is effectively isotropic. An isotropic material model can explain the bone density distribution, but not the structure and pattern of trabecular bone, which clearly has a mechanical significance. In this paper, an orthotropic material model is utilized to predict the proximal femur trabecular structure. Two hypotheses are combined to determine the local orientation and material properties of each element in the model. First, it is suggested that trabecular directions, which correspond to the orthotropic material axes, are determined locally by the maximal principal stress directions due to the multiple load cases (MLC) the femur is subject to. The second hypothesis is that material properties in each material direction can be determined using directional stimuli, thus extending existing adaptation algorithms to include directionality. An algorithm is utilized, where each iteration comprises of two stages. First, material axes are rotated to the direction of the largest principal stress that occurs from a multiple load scheme applied to the proximal femur. Next, material properties are modified in each material direction, according to a directional stimulus. Results show that local material directions correspond with known trabecular patterns, reproducing all main groups of trabeculae very well. The local directional stiffnesses, degree of anisotropy and density distribution are shown to conform to real femur morphology. 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available