4.0 Article

Lizard diversity on a rainforest-savanna altitude gradient in north-eastern Australia

Journal

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 86-94

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/ZO11036

Keywords

tropical; species richness; abundance; niche; Carlia; ecotone

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AWC)
  2. Australian Government National Heritage Trust
  3. Earthwatch Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mountain ecosystems act as natural experiments for investigating the relationship between environmental heterogeneity and species diversity. A review of the global altitudinal distribution of reptiles identified a diverse range of patterns driven by climate and taxonomy. No Australian examples were included in this analysis. We addressed this gap by surveying the reptile assemblage along an altitude gradient from upland rainforest (similar to 1000 m) through to open savanna woodlands (similar to 350 m) in north-eastern Australia. Reptiles were sampled on four separate occasions between May 2006 and November 2007. Thirty-six species, representing seven families, were recorded along the gradient. As we used only diurnal active searching, snakes and nocturnal geckoes were probably under-sampled; thus we considered only lizards in the analysis of altitude pattern. Lizard species richness peaked at the mid-altitudes (600-900 m, 11-12 spp.) and abundance highest at the lower (<500 m) and higher (>800 m) zones. This pattern is likely a factor of both the increase in radiant heat sources (reduced canopy cover) and increased species packing due to the diversity of niches available (presence of rock cover and increase in saxicolous species). In the lower-altitude sites the high abundance of few species seems linked to the dominance of disturbance-tolerant species. We conclude that lizard richness and abundance patterns on this transect are not necessarily exhibiting a mid-domain effect, but instead are a function of species-specific ecological and habitat requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available