4.8 Article

Formation of protein kinase Cε-Lck signalling modules confers cardioprotection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages 499-507

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI200213200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [1S10RR11368-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL065431, HL43151, R37 HL063901, R01 HL068088, HL68088, HL55757, HL-63901, R37 HL055757, R01 HL055757, R01 HL063901, HL65431] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The epsilon isoform of protein kinase C (PKCepsilon) is a member of the PKC family of serine/threonine kinases and plays a critical role in protection against ischemic injury in multiple organs. Functional proteomic analyses of PKCepsilon signaling show that this isozyme forms multiprotein complexes in the heart; however, the precise signaling mechanisms whereby PKCepsilon orchestrates cardioprotection are poorly understood. Here we report that Lck, a member of the Src family of tyrosine kinases, forms a functional signaling module with PKCepsilon. In cardiac cells, PKCepsilon interacts with, phosphorylates, and activates Lck. In vivo studies showed that cardioprotection elicited either by cardiac-specific transgenic activation of PKCepsilon or by ischemic preconditioning enhances the formation of PKCepsilon-Lck modules. Disruption of these modules, via ablation of the Lck gene, abrogated the infarct-sparing effects of these two forms of cardioprotection, indicating that the formation of PKCe-Lck signaling modules is required for the manifestation of a cardioprotective phenotype. These findings demonstrate, for the first time to our knowledge, that the assembly of a module (PKCepsilon-Lck) is an obligatory step in the signal transduction that results in a specific phenotype. Thus, PKCepsilon-Lck modules may serve as novel therapeutic targets for the prevention of ischemic injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available