3.9 Article

Soil pH buffering capacity: a descriptive function and its application to some acidic tropical soils

Journal

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 201-207

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/SR09150

Keywords

soil acidification; charge fingerprint; variable charge; organic matter; cation exchange capacity; Papua New Guinea; Andosol; sigmoid function

Categories

Funding

  1. The Papua New Guinea Oil Palm Research Association (PNGOPRA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calculation of soil acidification rates requires knowledge of pH buffering capacity (pHBC), which is measured using titration methods. The pHBC is often quoted as a single value for a particular soil, implying a linear relationship between pH and the amount of acid or alkali added. However, over its whole range, the relationship is sigmoid rather than linear, and in many soils pH is low or high enough to be outside of the linear range. In this work we fitted a simple sigmoid function to pH buffer curves of 8 tropical Australian soils obtained using one titration method and 58 Papua New Guinean (PNG) soils obtained using another titration method. The function described the curves well for all soils (adjusted r(2) > 0.93 for all samples and >0.99 for 90% of samples), irrespective of the titration method, allowing pHBC to be calculated as a function of pH across the range of pH values established. Using the function, the contribution of variable charge to pHBC was calculated for the PNG soils; on average it was 93% at the pH buffer curves' inflection point, which corresponds with the soil's minimum pHBC. Factors other than variable charge became important at pH (1:5, 0.002 M CaCl(2)) values <4.8 or >6.0. The relationship between pHBC and soil organic matter content was closest at pH 6.0-6.5. Application of the sigmoid function could facilitate more accurate assessments of acidification risks, acidification rates, and potential management interventions, particularly as soils become increasingly acidic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available