4.7 Article

Inhibition of human neutrophil elastase-induced acute lung injury in hamsters by recombinant human pre-elafin (trappin-2)

Journal

CHEST
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages 582-588

Publisher

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.121.2.582

Keywords

BAL fluid; hamsters; leukocyte elastase; lung; pulmonary emphysema; recombinant fusion proteins; serine proteinase inhibitors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objectives: Pre-elafin, also known as trappin-2, is an elastase-specific inhibitor that could be an ideal candidate for the treatment of neutrophil elastase-driven lung diseases. The inhibitory activity of pre-elafin resides in the COOH-terminal region that can be released as mature elafin. The NH2-terminal moiety of pre-elafin is characterized by, the presence of a specific repeating sequence, termed cementoin, believed to immobilize the inhibitor to lung protein components and restrict its diffusion from the desired sites of action. This property should confer an advantage to pre-elafin compared to elafin in the treatment of neutrophil elastase-driven lung diseases. Measurements: The inhibitory effect of recombinant human pre-elafin was assessed in a human neutrophil elastase-induced acute lung injury model in Golden Syrian banisters. BAL fluid hemoglobin content was used as a market, of lung injury. Results: Recombinant human pre-elafin administered intratracheally 1 h prior to neutrophil elastase dose-dependently inhibited the lung hemorrhage with a calculated half-effective dose of 8.1 mug/kg (0.7 nmol/kg). Pre-elafin was equally efficient when administered 3 h before neutrophil elastase. In contrast to pre-elafin, commercial synthetic elafin was ineffective in inhibiting neutrophil elastase-induced lung hemorrhage even at a dose of 4.45 nmol/kg. Conclusions: Our results suggest that pre-elafin may be eventually used in the treatment of neutrophil elastase-driven lung diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available