4.6 Article

Clinical and microbial evaluation of a histatin-containing mouthrinse in humans with experimental gingivitis: a phase-2 multi-center study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 168-176

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290212.x

Keywords

gingivitis; histatin; supragingival plaque; antimicrobial mouthrinse; clinical trial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: P-113, a 12 amino acid histatin-based peptide, was evaluated in a mouthrinse formulation for safety and efficacy in a phase 2 multi-center clinical study. Method: 294 healthy subjects abstained from oral hygiene procedures and self-administered either 0.01% P-113, 0.03% P-113 or placebo mouthrinse formulations twice daily over a 4-week treatment period. During this time, the safety, anti-gingivitis, and anti-plaque effects of P-113 were evaluated. Results: There was a significant reduction in the change from baseline to Day 22 in bleeding on probing in the 0.01% P-113 treatment group of the intent to treat population (p=0.049). Non-significant trends in the reduction of the other parameters were observed in this population (pgreater than or equal to0.159). A sub-group of subjects which developed significant levels of disease within the four-week timeframe of the study was identified based on baseline gingival index scores greater than or equal to0.75. Significant findings were observed for bleeding on probing, gingival index and plaque index within this population (p<0.05). There were no treatment-related adverse events, and there were no adverse shifts in supragingival microflora during the study. Significant amounts of the peptide were retained in the oral cavity following rinsing. Conclusion: These data suggest that P-113 mouthrinse is safe and reduces the development of gingival bleeding, gingivitis and plaque in the human experimental gingivitis model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available