Journal
CIRCULATION
Volume 105, Issue 5, Pages 645-649Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc0502.102963
Keywords
cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ventilation; heart arrest; fibrillation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background-Interruptions to chest compression-generated blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are detrimental. Data show that such interruptions for mouth-to-mouth ventilation require a period of rebuilding of coronary perfusion pressure to obtain the level achieved before the interruption. Whether such hemodynamic compromise from pausing to ventilate is enough to affect outcome is unknown. Methods and Results-Thirty swine (weight 35+/-2 kg) underwent 3 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation before 12 minutes of basic life support CPR. Animals were randomized to receive either standard airway (A), breathing (B), and compression (C) CPR with expired-gas ventilation in a 15:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio or continuous chest compression CPR. Those randomized to the standard 15:2 group had no chest compressions for a period of 16 seconds each time the 2 ventilations were delivered. Defibrillation was attempted at 15 minutes of cardiac arrest. All resuscitated animals were supported in an intensive care environment for I hour, then in a maintenance facility for 24 hours. The primary end point of neurologically normal 24-hour survival was significantly better in the experimental group receiving continuous chest compression CPR (12 of 15 versus 2 of 15; P<0.0001). Conclusions-Mouth-to-mouth ventilation performed by single layperson rescuers produces substantial interruptions in chest compression-supported circulation. Continuous chest compression CPR produces greater neurologically normal 24-hour survival than standard ABC CPR when performed in a clinically realistic fashion. Any technique that minimizes lengthy interruptions of chest compressions during the first 10 to 15 minutes of basic life support should be given serious consideration in future efforts to improve outcome results from cardiac arrest.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available