4.1 Article

Age-related mutation accumulation at a lacZ reporter locus in normal and tumor tissues of Trp53-deficient mice

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5718(01)00329-1

Keywords

Trp53-knockout mice; lacZ transgenic reporter mice; mutation accumulation; aging; tumors

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA75653] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG13319, AG17242] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES11044] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased genomic instability has been found associated with cancer and aging. The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a major determinant of genomic instability as a regulator of cell cycle control and apoptosis in response to DNA damage. To investigate the rate of age-related mutation accumulation in the absence of p53, we crossed Trp53 null mice with transgenic mice harboring a lacZ mutational target gene. In the hybrid animals, lacZ mutation frequencies at early age (i.e. at about 2 months) were found to be the same as in the control lacZ animals. However, up until about 6 months, when the Trp53-knockout mice usually die from cancer, mutations were found to accumulate with age in the spleen, and to a lesser extent in the liver, at a more rapid rate than in the control Trp53(+/+) or Trp53(+/-), lacZ hybrid mice. Treatment of 2-3-month-old Trp53(-/-), lacZ hybrid mice with the powerful mutagen ethyl nitrosourea (ENU) resulted in a higher number of mutations induced in the liver but not in the spleen, as compared to the Trp53(+/+), lacZ mice. These results suggest that p53 is not an important determinant of gene mutation induction, either spontaneously during development or after treatment with a mutagen. The accelerated age-related accumulation of mutations in normal spleen and liver could be explained by the defect in apoptosis, which would prevent severely damaged cells from being eliminated. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available