4.8 Article

Optimization of factors influencing the transfection efficiency of folate-PEG-folate-graft-polyethylenimine

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 79, Issue 1-3, Pages 255-269

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00513-2

Keywords

cytotoxicity; endocytosis; folic acid; gene expression; polyethylenimine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Folate-poly(ethylene glycol)-folate-grafted-polyethylenimine (FPF-g-PEI) was synthesized over a range of grafting ratios of folate-poly(ethylene glycol)-folate (FPF) to polyethylenimine (PEI). The conjugation was determined using the absorbance at 363 nm for each polymer. FPF-g-PEIs were determined to have 2.3, 5.2, 9.3 and 20 FPF linear polymers grafted to each PEI. The average molecular weight was calculated to be similar to34,848, 47,266, 64,823 and 110,640 Da, respectively. The pH profiles of FPF-g-PEIs suggest that the polymers have endosomal disruption capacity, and the gel electrophoretic band retardation showed efficient condensation of DNA. The transfection efficiency, determined using plasmid encoding luciferase, was dependent on the cell type and was different for CT-26 colon adenocarcinoma, KB oral epidermoid, and normal smooth muscle cells (SMC). The relative toxicity of polymer/plasmid complexes was determined using the MTT colorimetric assay. At neutral charge ratio, FPF-g-PEI/pLuc complexes were less toxic to cells and showed higher transfection in cancer cells compared to PEI/pLuc complexes. Smooth muscle cell, showed no specificity for FPF-g-PEI/pLuc complexes. whereas PEI/pLuc complexes showed a higher transfection efficiency. The transfection efficiency increased when neutral polymer/DNA complex concentrations increased, but decreased when positively charged polymer/DNA complex concentrations increased. There was little increase in toxicity when FPF-5.2g-PEI/pLuc complex concentrations increased. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available