4.5 Article

Chemical and electronic effects of Ni in Pt/Ni and Pt/Ru/Ni alloy nanoparticles in methanol electrooxidation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 106, Issue 8, Pages 1869-1877

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp013168v

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrooxidation of methanol in sulfuric acid solution was studied using Pt, Pt/Ni(1:1 and 3:1), Pt/Ru/Ni(5: 4:1 and 6:3.5:0.5), and Pt/Ru(1:1) alloy nanoparticle catalysts, in relation to methanol oxidation processes in the direct oxidation methanol fuel cell. The Pt/Ni and Pt/Ru/Ni alloys showed excellent catalytic activities compared to those of pure Pt and Pt/Ru. The role of Ni as a catalytically enhancing agent in the oxidation process was interrogated using cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction. X-ray diffraction data showed alloy formation for all Pt/Ni, Pt/Ru/Ni, and Pt/Ru nanoparticles, whereas X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirmed that chemical states of Pt were exclusively metallic. The presence of metallic Ni, NiO, Ni(OH)(2), NiOOH, metallic Ru, RuO2, and RuO3 was also confirmed. We found that the Pt4f binding energies for the Pt/Ni and Pt/Ru/Ni alloy nanoparticles were lower than those for clean Pt nanoparticles. The oxides that serve as the oxygen donors for the oxidation process, and the change in the electronic structure of the Pt component in the alloys versus those in Pt and Pt/Ru collectively account, we believe, for enhancement in rates of methanol oxidation. The difference in the peak shift in Pt4f between Pt/Ni and Pt/Ru alloy nanoparticles is discussed by using electronegativities of the three components: Pt, Ru, and Ni. A comparison between the alloy nanoparticle composition and that of disk alloy electrodes under similar conditions was made in terms of the surface-to-volume ratio and surface segregation of the alloying components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available