4.7 Article

The antioxidant N-2-mercaptopropionyl glycine attenuates left ventricular hypertrophy in in vivo murine pressure-overload model

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 907-912

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01826-5

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES In order to identify the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cardiac hypertrophy, we examined the effect of N-2-mercaptopropionyl glycine (MPG) on cardiac hypertrophy. BACKGROUND Recent in vitro studies have suggested that ROS play an important role as a second messenger in cardiac hypertrophy. It was therefore thought to be of particular value to examine the relevance of studies using in vitro models for cardiac hypertrophy in an in vivo setting. METHODS The transverse thoracic aorta in mice was constricted, and MPG (100 mg/kg) was infused intraperitoneally twice daily. The animals were assessed seven days after the operation for hemodynamic functions, oxidative stress and antioxidative enzyme activities. RESULTS Banding of the transverse aorta in mice resulted in an increase in the ratio of heart weight to tibia length and the appearance of an endogenous atrial natriuretic factor messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) seven days postoperatively. Administration of IMPG significantly attenuated the hypertrophic responses induced by pressure overload. Cardiac hypertrophy was accompanied by increases in heme oxygenase-1 mRNA expression and lipid peroxidation, which was eliminated by the treatment with MPG. Pressure overload led to increases in antioxidant enzyme activities, such as superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase, but not catalase, activity. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicated that oxidative stress was increased in our model and that it plays an important role in the development of cardiac hypertrophy. (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available