4.5 Article

Synchrotron X-ray fluorescence imaging evidence of biogenic mercury identified in a burial in colonial Antigua

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 26-30

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.03.006

Keywords

Synchrotron; Bone; Trace elements

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. National Research Council Canada
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Province of Saskatchewan
  5. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  6. University of Saskatchewan
  7. US Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences
  8. NSERC
  9. University of Washington
  10. Canadian Light Source
  11. Advanced Photon Source
  12. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  13. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  14. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P41GM103393]
  15. National Center for Research Resources [P41RR001209]
  16. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Insight Development Grant [430-2012-0236]
  17. Canada Research Chairs
  18. NSERC (Canada)
  19. SHRF
  20. CIHR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mass spectroscopic analysis of bone samples from 17 individuals once buried in a Royal Naval Hospital cemetery (1793-1822) in Antigua revealed a high level of mercury (Hg) in one individual. While the toxic properties of Hg are now recognized, this metal was used for centuries to treat ailments such as syphilis and yellow fever. Synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence imaging (XFI) was employed to determine whether the Hg was present in the bone as a result of environmental contamination or due to biogenic uptake. The XFI study revealed that only a localized subset of the osteons within a 2.5 mm by 1.5 mm scan contained Hg - a finding consistent with biogenic uptake. The near-edge portion of the X-ray absorption spectrum was used to determine that the Hg was present in the bone tissue as an inorganic mercuric sulfide. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available