4.8 Article

Na+ channel mutation that causes both Brugada and long-QT syndrome phenotypes -: A simulation study of mechanism

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages 1208-1213

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc1002.105183

Keywords

arrhythmia; genes; long-QT syndrome; Brugada syndrome; sodium

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R37-HL33343, T32 HL007887, T32 HL07887-03, R01 HL049054, R37 HL033343, R01-HL49054] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Complex physiological interactions determine the functional consequences of gene abnormalities and make mechanistic interpretation of phenotypes extremely difficult. A recent example is a single mutation in the C terminus of the cardiac Na+ channel. 1795insD. The mutation causes two distinct clinical syndromes, long QT (LQT) and Brugada. leading to life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Coexistence of these syndromes is seemingly paradoxical; LQT is associated with enhanced Na+ channel function, and Brugada with reduced function. Methods and Results-Using a computational approach, we demonstrate that the 1795insD mutation exerts variable effects depending on the myocardial substrate. We develop Markov models of the wild-type and 1795insD cardiac Na+ channels. By incorporating the models into a virtual transgenic cell, we elucidate the mechanism by which 1795insD differentially disrupts cellular electrical behavior in epicardial and midmyocardial cell types. We provide a cellular mechanistic basis for the ECG abnormalities observed in patients carrying the 1795insD gene mutation. Conclusions-We demonstrate that the 1795insD mutation call cause both LQT and Brugada syndromes through interaction with the heterogeneous myocardium in a rate-dependent manner. The results highlight the complexity and multiplicity of genotype-phenotype relationships, and the usefulness of computational approaches in establishing a mechanistic link between genetic defects and functional abnormalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available