4.7 Article

Screening model for volatile pollutants in dual porosity soils

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 260, Issue 1-4, Pages 58-74

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00597-2

Keywords

solute transport; soil; vapor transport; pesticides; screening models; mobile-immobile phase; biochemical decay; adsorption; dispersion; mass transfer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops mass fraction models for transport and fate of agricultural pollutants in structured two-region soils. Mass fraction index models. based on a semi-infinite domain solution. are derived that describe leaching at depth, vapor losses through soil surface, absorption, and degradation in the dynamic- and stagnant-water soil regions. The models predict that leaching is the result of the combined effect of the upward vapor-phase transport relative to downward advection, residence time relative to half-life, dispersion, and lateral diffusive mass transfer. Simulations show, that leached fraction of volatile compounds does not always decrease monotonically with increased residence time relative to the pollutant half-life, as a result of complex interactions among the different physical and biochemical processes. The results show that leaching, volatilization, and degradation losses can be affected significantly by lateral diffusive mass transfer into immobile-water regions and advection relative to dispersion (i.e. Peclet number) in the mobile-water regions. It is shown that solute diffusion into the immobile phase and subsequent biochemical decay reduces leaching and vapor losses through soil surface. Potential use of the modified leaching index for the screening of selected pesticides is illustrated for different soil textures and infiltration rates. The analysis may be useful to the management of pesticides and the design of landfills. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available