4.5 Article

Characterization and direct quantitation of ceramide molecular species from lipid extracts of biological samples by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 302, Issue 2, Pages 199-212

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/abio.2001.5536

Keywords

ceramide; cerebellum; cerebral endothelial cell; cortex; electrospray ionization; tandem mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41RR00954-240043] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P50AG05681] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid, simple, and reliable method has been developed for the characterization and quantitation of ceramide molecular species directly from chloroform extracts of biological samples by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI/MS/MS). By exploiting the differential fragmentation patterns of deprotonated ceramide ions, individual 2-hydroxy and nonhydroxy ceramide molecular species were readily identified by ESI/MS/MS with the neutral loss of fragments of mass 256.2 and 327.3 which correspond to sphingosine derivatives. The ions generated from the neutral loss of 256.2 (i.e., [M - H - 256.2](-)) are unique for ceramides with N-acyl sphingosine with the 18-carbon homolog. However, the sensitivity for nonhydroxy ceramides in ESI/MS/MS with the neutral loss of 256.2 is approximately threefold higher than that for 2-hydroxy ceramides. The ions resulting from the neutral loss of 327.3 (i.e., [M - H - 327.3]-) are specific for 2-hydroxy ceramides. Additionally, all ceramides including both 2-hydroxy and nonhydroxy forms can be confirmed and accurately quantitated by ESI/MS/MS with the neutral loss of 240.2 after correction for C-13 isotope factors. This methodology demonstrated a 1000-fold linear dynamic range and a detection limit at the subfemtomole range and was applied to directly quantitate ceramide molecular species in chloroform extracts of biological samples including brain tissues and cell cultures. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available