4.7 Article

Differential requirement for LAT and SLP-76 in GPVI versus T cell receptor signaling

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 195, Issue 6, Pages 705-717

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20011583

Keywords

SLP-76; LAT; GPVI; integrin alpha IIb beta 3; T cell receptor

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mice deficient in the adaptor Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte phosphoprotein of 76 kD (SLP-76) exhibit a bleeding disorder and lack T cells. Linker for activation of T cells (LAT)-deficient mice exhibit a similar T cell phenotype, but show no signs of hemorrhage. Both SLP-76 and LAT are important for optimal platelet activation downstream of the collagen receptor, GPVI In addition, SLP-76 is involved in signaling mediated by integrin alphaIIbbeta3. Because SLP-76 and LAT function coordinately in T cell signal transduction, yet their roles appear to differ in hemostasis, we investigated in detail the functional consequences of SLP-76 and LAT deficiencies in platelets. Previously we have shown that LAT(-/-) platelets exhibit defective responses to the GPVI-specific agonist, collagen-related peptide (CRP). Consistent with this, we find that surface expression of P-selectin in response to high concentrations of GPVI ligands is reduced in both LAT- and SLP-76-deficient platelets. However, platelets from LAT(-/-) mice, but not SLP-76(-/-) mice, aggregate normally in response to high concentrations of collagen and convulxin. Additionally, unlike SLP-76, LAT is not tyrosine phosphorylated after fibrinogen binding to integrin alphaIIbbeta3, and collagen-stimulated platelets deficient in LAT spread normally on fibrinogen-coated surfaces. Together, these findings indicate that while LAT and SLP-76 are equally required for signaling via the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) and pre-TCR, platelet activation downstream of GPVI and alphaIIbbeta3 shows a much greater dependency on SLP-76 than LAT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available