4.8 Article

Natural history of Brugada syndrome - Insights for risk stratification and management

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 105, Issue 11, Pages 1342-1347

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc1102.105288

Keywords

death, sudden; tachyarrhythmias; risk factors; genetics; fibrillation

Funding

  1. Telethon [GP0227Y01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Treatment of patients with Brugada syndrome is complicated by the incomplete information on the natural history of the disease related to the small number of cases reported. Furthermore, the value of programmed electrical stimulation (PES) for risk stratification is highly debated. The objective of this study was to search for novel parameters to identify patients at risk of sudden death. Methods and Results-Clinical data were collected for 200 patients (152 men. 48 women; age, 41 18 years) and stored in a dedicated database. Genetic analysis was performed, and mutations on the SCN5A gene were identified in 28 of 130 probands and in 56 of 121 family members. The life-table method of Kaplan-Meier used to define the cardiac arrest-free interval in patients undergoing PES failed to demonstrate an association between PES inducibility and spontaneous occurrence of ventricular fibrillation. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that after adjusting for sex, family history of sudden death, and SCN5A mutations, the combined presence of a spontaneous ST-segment elevation in leads V-1 through V-3 and the history of syncope identifies subjects at risk of cardiac arrest (HR, 6.4; 95% Cl, 1.9 to 21; P<0.002). Conclusions-The information on the natural history of patients obtained in this study allowed elaboration of a risk-stratification scheme to quantify the risk for sudden cardiac death and to target the use of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available